A systematic review of reported outcomes following Ponseti correction of idiopathic club foot

Aims
To analyze outcomes reported in studies of Ponseti correction of idiopathic clubfoot.

Methods
A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify a list of outcomes and outcome tools reported in the literature. A total of 865 studies were screened following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and 124 trials were included in the analysis. Data extraction was completed by two researchers for each trial. Each outcome tool was assigned to one of the five core areas defined by the Outcome Measures Recommended for use in Randomized Clinical Trials (OMERACT). Bias assessment was not deemed necessary for the purpose of this paper.

Results
In total, 20 isolated outcomes and 16 outcome tools were identified representing five OMERACT domains. Most outcome tools were appropriately designed for children of walking age but have not been embraced in the literature. The most commonly reported isolated outcomes are subjective and qualitative. The quantitative outcomes most commonly used are ankle range of motion (ROM), foot position in standing, and muscle function.

Conclusions
There is a diverse range of outcomes reported in studies of Ponseti correction of clubfoot. Until outcomes can be reported unequivocally and consistently, research in this area will be limited. Completing the process of establishing and validating COS is the much-needed next step.

Contributors

Yael Gelfer, Katie Patterson Hughes, Andreas Fontalis, Shlomo Wientroub, Deborah M. Eastwood

Publication

Journal: Bone Joint Open
Volume:
Issue:
Pages: 457 - 464
Year: 2020
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.18.BJO-2020-0109.R1

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Completed
Date: March 2018 - August 2018
Funding source(s): None


Health Area

Disease Category: Orthopaedics & trauma

Disease Name: Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), Clubfoot

Target Population

Age Range: 0 - 21

Sex: Either

Nature of Intervention: N/A

Stakeholders Involved

- None

Study Type

- Systematic review of outcomes measured in trials

Method(s)

- Systematic review