Outcome measures and their measurement properties for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review

The objective was to identify all outcome measures used in studies on trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMC OA) and evaluate their measurement properties. In a two-step systematic literature review, we first identified studies including TMC OA patients and extracted all outcome measures. They were categorized according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) core set for OA including five dimensions: pain, physical function, global assessment, imaging, and quality of life (QoL). Secondly, we retrieved articles on the measurement properties of the identified outcome measures for TMC OA patients. First, 316 articles including 101 different outcome measures were identified, addressing the OMERACT pain and function domains most frequently but under-representing QoL. Second, 12 articles investigating measurement properties of 12 outcome measures were identified. The methodological quality of these studies was poor to fair, implying that based on the literature no recommendations to use any of the outcome measures can yet be made.

Aim

The objective was to identify all outcome measures used in studies on trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMC OA) and evaluate their measurement properties.

Contributors

Marks M, Schoones JW, Kolling C, Herren DB, et al

Publication

Journal:
Volume:
Issue:
Pages: 822 - 838
Year: 2013
DOI: 10.1177/1753193413488301

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Completed
Date:
Funding source(s): This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.


Health Area

Disease Category: Rheumatology

Disease Name: trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis

Target Population

Age Range: Unknown

Sex: Either

Nature of Intervention: Any

Stakeholders Involved

Study Type

- COS uptake study

Method(s)

- Systematic review

A literature search was performed for articles published up to November 2010 in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, ScienceDirect, and PEDro. Data for objective and subjective outcome measures was extracted