A core outcome set for cervical spondylosis treated with acupotomy

Acupotomy has become an important method in the clinical treatment of cervical spondylosis, but there is no standard COS to evaluate the efficacy of acupotomy in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. We planned COS for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). This is different from the protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type, including time for measuring the outcomes: the type of vertebral artery targeted in the CSA-COS study. At the same time, in contrast to the study of a core outcome set for clinical trials postoperative axial symptoms in patients with cervical spondylosis, the COS studied by their team is a postoperative residual symptom of cervical spondylosis. However, we evaluated all the symptoms and problems that occurred during the whole course of acupotomy treatment of cervical spondylosis. Moreover, CSR accounts for 50 to 60% of all types of cervical spondylosis, and its incidence is the highest among all types of cervical spondylosis, so this work is crucial.

Contributors

Xiaohang Yang

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Ongoing
Date: March 2025 - April 2026
Funding source(s): Clinical multi-center Evaluation Study of Dominant diseases and diagnosis and treatment rules of acupotomology (2023YFC3502701)


Health Area

Disease Category: Anaesthesia & pain control

Disease Name: cervical spondylosis

Target Population

Age Range: 18 - 120

Sex: Either

Nature of Intervention: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapy

Stakeholders Involved

- Clinical experts
- Conference participants
- Consumers (caregivers)
- Consumers (patients)
- Families
- Researchers
- Statisticians

Study Type

- COS for clinical trials or clinical research
- COS for practice

Method(s)

- Consensus conference
- Delphi process
- Focus group(s)
- Interview
- Literature review
- Nominal group technique (NGT)
- Semi structured discussion
- Survey
- Systematic review

1. Establish stakeholder groups
2. Search relevant literature in English database from January 2023 to December 2024
3. Semi-structured interviews with patients
4. Data collection from literature research and patient survey
5. Two rounds of Delphi questionnaire
6. A consensus meeting was held to determine the outcome

Linked Studies

    No related studies


Related Links

    No related links